{"id":2940,"date":"2024-03-13T15:38:21","date_gmt":"2024-03-13T14:38:21","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.robotor.it\/?p=2940"},"modified":"2024-03-13T15:38:21","modified_gmt":"2024-03-13T14:38:21","slug":"is-there-art-in-a-copy","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/litix2.devworks.it\/?p=2940","title":{"rendered":"Is There Art in a Copy?"},"content":{"rendered":"
The article traces the history of the dispute between Greece and England since 1800, when some of the Parthenon marbles were brought to England. The attached video shows the stages of work on one of the statues, the horse’s head, at TORART.<\/p>\n

The article was also published in the “print” version of the newspaper in the “Science Times” section with the title “Is There Art in a Copy?”<\/p>\n

Here is the beginning of the article:<\/p>\n

Few cultural disputes inflame British passions more than the disposition of the Parthenon Marbles. Public debate about the statuary has raged since the early 1800s, when the sculptures and bas-reliefs, which date from 447 B.C. to 432 B.C., were stripped from the Parthenon and other Classical Greek temples on the Acropolis of Athens by agents of Thomas Bruce, a Scottish statesman and seventh earl of Elgin. The marbles were purchased \u2014 some say looted \u2014 by Elgin during his time as ambassador to the Ottoman Empire, the occupying power; they have resided in the British Museum since 1817.<\/p>\n

Greek campaigners have repeatedly called on Britain to repatriate the works, arguing that the Turks were a foreign force acting against the will of the people they had invaded. The works, commonly known as the Elgin marbles, would instead be exhibited in Athens, in a purpose-built museum at the foot of the Acropolis. In May, the country\u2019s culture minister, the archaeologist Lina Mendoni, said in a statement to the\u00a0Guardian<\/a>, \u201cLord Elgin used illicit and inequitable means to seize and export the Parthenon sculptures, without real legal permission to do so, in a blatant act of serial theft.\u201d<\/p>\n

But officials at the British Museum have staunchly rejected the requests. Backed by a succession of British governments, the museum has justified retaining the marbles on the grounds that Lord Elgin acquired them legitimately; it claims that taking the relics to London helped to safeguard them from neglect and the corrosive effects of Athens\u2019 acid rain and that they are part of a shared heritage, and thus transcend cultural boundaries.<\/p>\n

\u201cWe are open to exploring any potential loan,\u201d a British Museum spokesperson said, \u201cwith formal acknowledgment of the lender\u2019s title to objects and a commitment to return objects a standard precondition.\u201d But Greece will neither acknowledge the lender\u2019s title to the objects, nor will it abide by the \u201cstandard precondition.\u201d<\/p>\n